Share Print Page







Leah Bojnowski is a litigator who represents corporate entities of various sizes in industries including investment banking, consumer products and technology in federal and state court as well as in arbitration and before regulatory agencies.

What do you focus on?

I focus on commercial disputes involving the laws regulating securities and financial markets. Recently, I handled litigation involving the proper valuation of a leveraged leasing contract and a dispute between several financial institutions as to the proper calculation of a related contingent payment.

I have handled several class actions, defending issuers and underwriters in shareholder suits, product manufacturers facing claims of false advertising, and insurers in connection with claims relating to asbestos and lead paint.

I also counsel clients on issues of false advertising, especially in the context of marketing through social media. I help clients set up guidelines for live Twitter chats, interact with media influencers for exposure on popular blogs, and generate traffic on Facebook in order to promote their products.

I am technology-savvy and have a great deal of experience managing electronic discovery and data retrieval in complex litigation. Using new and cutting-edge tools allows me to help clients control the costs associated with e-discovery.

What do you see on the horizon?

As our digital footprints continue to grow beyond the use of e-mail, the potential costs of electronic discovery loom higher and higher. I follow the developing trends in this field in order to advise clients on best practices for business communication as well as conducting electronic discovery with a manageable, realistic plan.


  • “Keeping things Basic: The Supreme Court rules in Halliburton,” Securities Litigation Alert, 6/24/2014.
  • “Alternative Dispute Resolution Law,” Annual Review of Developments in Business and Corporate Litigation, American Bar Association. 2008, 2009, 2010 , 2011 and 2012 editions.
  • “Second Circuit holds that a plaintiff may plead corporate scienter in securities fraud suit without pleading scienter of any specific individual defendant” 7/7/2008.
  • “Supreme Court holds that parties may not agree to expand grounds for vacating or modifying an arbitration agreement under Federal Arbitration Act” 4/1/2008.

Before joining Nixon Peabody, Leah was an associate at Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP in New York City.

Media Clips

  • Don't "Put the Cart Before the Horse": Supreme Court Rejects Amgen's Argument that Securities Fraud Plaintiffs Must Prove Materiality of Alleged Misrepresentations at the Class Certification Stage
    Legal Insights | April 15, 2013

    Commercial litigation partners Chris Mason and Carolyn Nussbaum and commercial litigation associates Paige Berges and Leah Threatte Bojnowski co-authored this column about the Supreme Court’s split decision upholding the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Amgen Inc. v. Conn. Retirement Plans and Trust Funds.



Leah Threatte Bojnowski