Trade Secrets
Related Services
Hot Topics
Brochures
|
|
TRADE SECRETS
Trade secrets are more than just an “IP issue” or an “employment matter.” To effectively manage and protect an organization’s trade secrets, all of the pieces must be pulled together in a robust and comprehensive effort. Unlike some other firms, Nixon Peabody takes a complete 360-degree approach to trade secrets. We understand the content that is at risk and we know how to protect it effectively—through proper technology applications, procedures, training, communications, and, if necessary, litigation or other dispute resolution.
Nixon Peabody’s Trade Secrets team is made up of seasoned professionals that have extensive experience dealing with all aspects of trade secret identification and protection. Our team is composed of more than 20 attorneys from across the firm who have significant experience protecting clients’ trade secrets through preventive efforts and litigation. Our lawyers come from our Intellectual Property, Labor & Employment, Business Litigation, Government Investigations/White Collar, and Information Law practices.
Comprehensive trade secret services
- Trade secret protection program reviews and evaluations
- Employee, manager, and executive training
- Investigations into trade secret loss or theft
- Trade secrets litigation, including matters involving the Uniform Trade Secrets Act, the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, the Economic Espionage Act, and other state and federal statutes
- Employment agreement drafting and enforcement
- Preliminary injunctions and restraining orders
- Trade secret licensing and related antitrust issues
- Expert witness engagements
- Spoliation and electronic evidence discovery issues
- Non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements
- Trade secret protection programs and incident response protocols
- Trade secret policies, procedures, and best practices for trade secret asset management
- Proprietary intellectual asset/portfolio development strategies
Asset protection
A business’ most valuable corporate assets are likely not sitting in a vault or on a balance sheet—but in hard drives, file cabinets, notebooks, and in its employees’ heads. This information is crucial to the success of a business, and in the hands of a competitor can be a devastatingly powerful competitive advantage.
- Customer and supplier lists
- Manufacturing processes and drawings
- Software source codes
- Marketing and business plans
- Designs and creative concepts
Non-disclosure agreements and restrictive covenants
We draw upon our enforcement experience to develop appropriate, enforceable restrictive covenants and contractual provisions that address state-specific issues that can protect employees from trade secret misappropriation and minimize the potential for litigation. In addition, we can train employers on best practices in educating their workforces on their trade secret obligations and protocols for protecting their data and information.
24/7 rapid response
We understand that trade secrets issues often require lightning-fast action. Our Trade Secrets team has a track record of responding to client needs in 24 hours or less. Whenever or wherever we are needed, members of our team can be on the ground and in a courtroom, if necessary, filing or responding to a TRO or other injunctive relief. We have experience protecting our clients’ interests and assets across all 50 U.S. states and in foreign countries. Speed counts in trade secrets—and we deliver a rapid response for our clients.
Life sciences
Our Trade Secrets team actively works with many companies in the life sciences industries. These innovative companies rely upon trade secrets in almost every aspect of their operations. Establishing effective protocols in regard to this confidential information is particularly critical to clients in this field. We have served as counsel for life sciences clients establishing trade secrets policies. We also provide advice on breach issues and litigate related matters for these clients.
Representative engagements
- Trial counsel for a defendant in a trade secret misappropriation lawsuit involving the alleged misappropriation of trade secrets relating to emergency airstrip lighting systems.
- Trial counsel for defendants in a trade secret misappropriation lawsuit involving acoustic echo cancellation technology.
- Trial counsel for a beverage can company in a trade secret misappropriation lawsuit involving ultrasonic technology for sealing beverage cans.
- Trial counsel for the manufacturer of plastic films, nonwovens, and laminates for personal care, packaging, and specialty markets in a trade secret misappropriation case involving proprietary elastic films and laminate technologies.
- Trial counsel for an international company involving proprietary technology relating to zinc extraction technologies.
- Counsel for medical device manufacturer in action to enjoin former employee group’s use of stolen trade secrets, including customer lists and business plans.
- Counsel for medical device manufacturer to prevent the marketing of competing products and to recover damages based on theft of trade secrets, including source code used in key product and based on theft of ideas and research developed for new products, including patentable claims.
- Special counsel for a major company in an economic espionage investigation.
- Counsel for a restaurant chain in a lawsuit involving the alleged misappropriation of recipes and knowhow by former employees.
- Counsel for a precision cutting tools manufacturer in a trade secret misappropriation lawsuit involving proprietary manufacturing equipment and manufacturing processes.
- Counsel for staffing firm on trade secret matter involving the firm’s customer list.
- Counsel for entrepreneurs accused by former employers for basing the new enterprises on trade secrets from their previous firms.
- Advisor for many companies on trade secret asset management programs—trade secret audits, policies, and other protective measures.
- Counsel to an international oil and gas trading firm. We defended a claim for theft of trade secrets and employee raiding.
- Counsel to a technology company as a plaintiff in a major employee raiding case involving a single facility and the use of customer lists by a major competitor.
- Counsel to a major insurance brokerage where a former employee had taken the electronically stored database of customer information.
- Counsel to semiconductor equipment manufacturer in action to prevent former employee’s use of trade secrets, including customer information and business opportunities, to lure business, and to recover for theft of trade secrets, including technical formulae for design and production of products. The case also involved defense of cross-claims by former employee for defamation (arising from alleged publication of facts of employee’s trade secret theft), interference with prospective business advantage, and breach of contract and application of statutory privilege to such claims.
Thought Leadership/AlertsThe Foreign and Economic Espionage Penalty Enhancement Act: the need for trade secret audits Trade Secrets Alert | February 20, 2013 The Theft of Trade Secrets Clarification Act of 2012 Trade Secrets Alert | February 12, 2013 . . . View all . . .
3D printing: new "disruptive technology" raises serious intellectual property questions
Intellectual Property Alert
|
December 3, 2012
Webinar Recording: Marketing Your Products and Services Without Losing Your IP
Originally recorded June 14, 2012
|
June 19, 2012
Webinar Recording: Trade Secret Protection in the Baseball Analytics Field
Originally recorded April 9, 2012
|
April 11, 2012
Employer's social media profile and "friends" list can be trade secrets under Colorado law
Employment Law Alert
|
March 21, 2012
California Court of Appeal weighs in on trade secrets protection for insurance companies in unpublished decision
Insurance Law Alert
|
February 28, 2012
Webinar Recording: Trade Secrets: Your Secret Weapon Under Patent Reform
October 13, 2011
New Legislation Introduced to Establish Federal Cause of Action for Trade Secrets Theft
Trade Secrets Alert
|
October 11, 2011
Trade secret assets: prior user rights expanded under the America Invents Act
Trade Secrets Alert
|
September 15, 2011
Ninth Circuit clarifies jurisdiction rules in intellectual property cases brought against out-of-state companies operating on the Internet
Intellectual Property Alert
|
August 16, 2011
Seeing red: NY court refuses to enforce single color trademark for shoe design
Intellectual Property Alert
|
August 15, 2011
First Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell (iPSC) Patent Approved by the EPO
Intellectual Property Alert
|
August 2, 2011
Federal Circuit issues opinion in ACLU v. Myriad
Intellectual Property Alert
|
July 29, 2011
Patent reform primer Changes to the grace period
Intellectual Property Alert
|
July 14, 2011
New .XXX domain name tentatively scheduled to launch September 7, 2011 — clients are advised they may be able to block certain domains to prevent future use
Intellectual Property Alert
|
June 21, 2011
U.S. PTO Restriction Practice: Personalized medicine claims with SNPs
Intellectual Property Alert
|
June 13, 2011
Employers (particularly universities): check your invention assignment agreements!
Intellectual Property Alert
|
June 7, 2011
Therasense decision highlights specific intent requirement for inequitable conduct determinations
Intellectual Property Alert
|
June 1, 2011
Follow-on Biologics legislation has immediate impact on patent holders
Intellectual Property Alert
|
May 25, 2011
Protecting personalized medicine innovation in China and India: Are diagnostic methods patentable?
Intellectual Property Alert
|
May 17, 2011
A patent in 12 months? But it will cost you!
Intellectual Property Alert
|
April 6, 2011
Federal Circuit hears oral argument on Myriad ”gene patents”
Intellectual Property Alert
|
April 4, 2011
The Federal Circuit holds that the heightened pleading standards of Rule 9(b) apply to false patent marking claims, finding general allegations of “sophistication” and “knowledge” to be insufficient to state a claim under Section 292
Intellectual Property Alert
|
March 15, 2011
Export controls compliance certification: Required as of February 20, 2011, for employment of many foreign nationals
Immigration Law Alert
|
March 3, 2011
Restrictions on the beneficial use of software
Intellectual Property Alert
|
November 16, 2010
In Stauffer decision, Federal Circuit finds that qui tam relator has standing to pursue false marking claims under Patent Act
Intellectual Property Alert
|
August 31, 2010
According to the Patent Office, the machine-or-transformation test is alive and well
Intellectual Property Alert
|
July 2, 2010
Supreme Court affirms Federal Circuit’s judgment that risk hedging claims not patent eligible; rejects “machine-or-transformation” test as sole test of patent eligibility of process claims
Intellectual Property Alert
|
June 28, 2010
. . . Hide Thought Leadership. . .
Media Clips
Events
|