Introduction
Gabriel Mendoza represents employers in a wide range of disputes and litigation. Clients turn to him for preventive advice and counseling related to workplace law matters.
My focus
I dedicate my practice to defending employers against wage and hour disputes, including Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) and class action matters, and claims of discrimination, harassment, retaliation, employee misclassifications, independent contractor disputes, meal and rest breaks, off-the-clock work, failure-to-pay, and wrongful termination in single and multi-plaintiff/defendant matters.
In addition to my litigation experience, I advise clients on employment policies and practices, including review of separation agreements, employee handbooks, and meal and rest period policies and waivers. I also draft notices of employee privacy rights and Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) memorandums for PAGA and class action matters. I assist clients with disciplinary actions and investigations, conduct employment practices reviews, and wage and hour exposure analyses and calculations.
Representative experience
- Representation of corporations in their dealings with labor unions, including vulnerability assessments and disciplinary actions.
- Wage and hour class and collective actions, as well as OSHA (Occupational health and safety act) and other workplace safety issues.
- Litigation related to sex, race, age and national origin discrimination, harassment, wrongful termination and employment-related restrictive covenants.
- Non-contentious matters relating to day-to-day business issues as well as workforce restructuring, and employment issues related to reclassification, reductions in force, asset sales, mergers, and acquisitions.
- Advice on the writing of policy handbooks for major corporations and HR training.
Looking ahead
Understanding PAGA and wage and hour lawsuits is crucial for employers—especially those in California—to manage financial risks. Employers need to know how civil penalties are determined and the role of “aggrieved employees” who represent others in these cases. As the law in this field continues to evolve, employers need counsel who adapts to developments in the law in order to better position themselves to manage such risks.
In the news
- Dispute Resolution Journal
Key decisions on Federal Arbitration Act Section 1: impact on arbitration agreements
July 29, 2024Labor & Employment partner Rob Pepple and associates Alex Castro and Gabriel Mendoza, and Complex Disputes associates Jonathan Assia and Brock Seraphin, all of the Los Angeles office, contributed this article discussing recent interpretations that have redefined the scope of the Federal Arbitration Act’s “contracts of employment” exemption.
Admitted to practice
California
U.S. District Court, Central District of California
Education
University of Southern California, Gould School of Law, J.D.
University of California, Riverside, B.A.
Languages
Spanish
Insights And Happenings
View AllProfessionals in the Practice Area
View AllJeffrey B. Gilbreth
Partner / Practice Group Leader, Labor & Employment- Boston
- Office:+1 617.345.1371
- jgilbreth@nixonpeabody.com
-
Stacie B. Collier
Partner / Chief Talent Officer- Providence
- Office:+1 401.454.1018
- sbcollier@nixonpeabody.com
-
Eric Paley
Partner / Team Leader, Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation- Rochester
- Office:+1 585.263.1012
- epaley@nixonpeabody.com
-